AMERICA’S HEMP CZAR: YES WE REALLY DID HAVE ONE: America entered the war in December (or the tail end) of 1941, and given the initial Japanese successes it became obvious by the spring of ’42 that America’s War factories were soon going to be facing some serious material shortages. In Terms of the subject at hand the situation was looking so dire that Washington even appointed a “Hemp Czar” to address the issue. Although according to the Wall Street Journal, McCroy himself disliked the term. Wall Street Journal - Dec 4, 1943p1 From what we’ve been able to find, Mc Croy himself was quite an interesting person in his own right. According to a 1946 Washington Post newspaper article: Washington Post - 12-07-1946p7 Part of his obituary (again from the Washington Post), reads as follows: Washington Post - 02-22-1949pb2 So all and all, even were he not to have been appointed the Hemp Czar during the war, he would still be seen as a bit of an American success story, if not an out and out hero. Here was a man who probably did a lot for the farming community, not just in the U.S., but it appears throughout the world. However there are some amusing if not ironic tidbits that history has not yet accounted for. For instance take a look at the ten-dollar-bill below: This 1910’s era bank note which was originally intended to be representative of both Agriculture as well as Industry. And in case you haven’t noticed it the farmer is harvesting a crop of Industrial Hemp. A situation that McCroy, employed by the Department of Agriculture at the time would have been all to well aware of. It is also a fact that (and some of you none historians out their might not believe this); Before there was the D.E.A. (1970-72), there was the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1930), and before that there was the Bureau of Prohibition (1920’s, narcotics sub-unit thereof). However, few if any understand that, before that narcotic law enforcement was attributed to the Bureau of Chemistry, which was attached to the Department of Agriculture. Which would have meant that McCory would have been working side by side with the narc’s of his day. And it is also a fact that it was these narc’s (not Anslinger) that were in fact the creators of we today would come to know as the “Reefer Madness Campaign.” Maybe their most important work toward that end was the following report: 1914 - Report of investigation in the State of Texas, particularly along the Mexican border, of the traffic in, and consumption of the drug generally known as "Indian hemp," or cannabis indica : known in Mexico and states bordering on the Rio Grande River as "Marihuana, " sometimes also referred to as "Rosa Maria, " or "Juanita." Author: Smith, R. Publication: Washington: Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Chemistry, - Year: 1917Which, as far as reefer madness was concerned, its contents were something that would do Anslinger proud. And it would also correspond (in time frame) to the first newspaper articles linking Marihuana and violent crimes. Coincidence, maybe, and it should be noted that McCory himself would have been a very junior official at the time. But still, he must have known that something was amiss and for whatever reason never brought the subject up; not even during the war as the Hemp Czar. One can only wonder what would have happened had he opened his mouth up when he had the chance. A pity. Of Historical Note: Some might wonder how the Department of Agriculture ended up controlling the narc’s for a while. For this we have one Harvey Wiley for the creation of what we now know as the Wiley laws.
WANT TO KNOW MORE: ===================== Due to space / download time considerations, only selected materials are displayed. If you would like to obtain more information, feel free to contact the museum. All our material is available (at cost) on CD-Rom format. CONTACT PAGE
|